37-ecat E-Catalog
80-services Services
39-magazine Magazine
36-downloads Downloads
35-contact Contact
47-chevron-right
3D Animation - PFAS
wave-white

Statement on the European Chemicals Agency PFAS Restriction Proposal

In early February 2023, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has published a proposal prepared by five EU member states to regulate the substance class of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS*), which is intended to largely restrict the placing on the market, manufacture, use and import of all PFAS.

On September 25th, 2023, the six-month public consultation period, where affected parties had the opportunity to provide further information to the ECHA on scientific and socio-economic factors, ended. More than 4,400 organizations, companies and individuals submitted more than 5,600 comments and information on the restriction proposal to the ECHA.

Freudenberg Sealing Technologies has also participated in the stakeholder consultation and actively engaged in relevant industry associations. We fully support the goals of the European Green Deal and the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability to improve protection of human health and the environment from risks posed by chemicals and we advocate for a responsible, differentiated and risk-based approach to regulate PFAS. More details on our statement on the EU PFAS restriction proposal are available at https://echa.europa.eu/restrictions-under-consideration/-/substance-rev/72301/term

ECHA’s committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) will now evaluate the proposed restriction and consider the relevant information received through the consultation.

* PFAS definition: Any substance that contains at least one fully fluorinated methyl (CF3-) or methylene (-CF2-) carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I attached to it).

 

PFAS REACH Restriction - Indicative Timeline

The following diagram shows the next steps in more detail:


We will continue to offer fluoropolymer-based materials like PTFE and FKM for the time being, given the fact that these fluoropolymers have exceptional resistance against temperature, corrosion, chemicals, and wear. Moreover, the characteristics of fluoropolymers allow a broad application range and robustness against unknown or varying fluids. We are committed to serve our customers’ needs and make use of these high-performing raw materials being embedded in our long-term supply strategy that includes not only external but also internal sources.

At the same time, we will continue to monitor the restriction proposal and legal requirements closely to be a reliable partner for our customers.

In addition, we will continue offering many other high-performance materials in our portfolio that do not contain fluoropolymers. Due to our long-term experience and expertise in material development and testing, we are continuously evaluating and developing application-based alternatives.

Besides the ongoing EU restriction proposal, are also closely monitoring recent developments and reporting obligations outside of Europe. We will comply with applicable requirements and align with affected customers as soon as specific reporting obligations will become effective.

Click here to find our statement to the ECHA on the planned restriction proposal

Login with your access data

* mandatory field

Forgot your password? Click here to reset.

Or

Don’t have an account yet? Register now!

You've logged in successfully.

Register and get access to exclusive content

Your benefits

  • Download exclusive documents such as Solution Sheets
  • Live Webinare/On-Demand Recordings on the beverage and food industry
  • Virtual tours of production facilities
  • Resistance tools for selecting the right material

Security Level

* mandatory field

Or

Do you already have an account? Continue to Login.

Thank you. Your subscription was successful.

We have sent you an e-mail. Please click on the included activation link to complete the registration.

We have sent you an email. Please click on the included link to assign a new password.

Have you forgotten your password?

Please enter your email address to reset it.

* mandatory field

The form has been successfully sent.

We have sent you an email. Please click on the included link to assign a new password.

    Q&A

  • Are PFAS moderately to slightly hazardous substances? 66-plus 67-minus

    No, polymeric substances are clearly toxicologically harmless. Our PTFE and FKM materials for applications in the pharmaceutical and food & beverage industries have been intensively tested and comply with all legal requirements.

    It is impossible to make a general statement about the toxicity of PFAS, as this broad group contains 10,000 of different substances. Fluoropolymers like FKM or PTFE are defined by OECD as ‘polymers of low concern’ which have insignificant environmental and human health impacts.

  • What is PFAS and what is the regulation proposal about? 66-plus 67-minus

    In its 2020 chemicals strategy for sustainability, the European Union (EU) formulated a zero-pollutant target that aims to better protect citizens and the environment from harmful chemicals.

    In mid-February 2023, the European Chemicals Agency ECHA published a proposal prepared by five EU member states to regulate the substance class of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which is intended to largely restrict the placing on the market, manufacture, use and import of PFAS.

    The approximately 10,000 per- and polyfluorinated alkyl compounds (PFAS) affected by the forthcoming EU regulation can be divided into two groups: the low molecular weight per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (small molecules) and the polymers (large molecules).

  • Which polymer materials used by Freudenberg Sealing Technologies and affected by the PFAS regulation fall under PFAS? 66-plus 67-minus

    Polymers include, for example, thermoplastics such as PTFE, PVDF, FEP and rubbers FKM, FFKM and FVMQ. Freudenberg Sealing Technologies does not manufacture these itself but we use them - mainly PTFE and FKM - as base materials for some of our sealing materials.

  • Are there PFAS-free alternatives to the affected materials used by Freudenberg Sealing Technologies? 66-plus 67-minus

    The materials in question, such as PTFE and FKM, are high-performance materials: they have a long lifetime and a high temperature resistance; they are resistant to aggressive media and resistant to wear.

    In very few cases will there be a 1:1 replacement with other suitable materials that meet these requirements. Reductions in e.g. the service life are to be expected.

  • Which Freudenberg Sealing Technologies parts contain PFAS? Is there an affected parts list? 66-plus 67-minus

    Freudenberg Sealing Technologies has evaluated the affected parts on the basis of the information available from the restriction proposal and is in contact with customers regarding the affected part numbers. In this context, please note that affected part numbers may change depending on the wording of the final EU Commission's proposal to amend REACH Art. XVII.

  • What is the PFAS concentration in affected parts? 66-plus 67-minus

    The current restriction proposal does not evaluate on the PFAS concentration. Parts containing any concentration would be affected, which is why Freudenberg Sealing Technologies does not focus on assessing the concrete PFAS concentration of affected parts at the moment.

  • What are Freudenberg Sealing Technologies’ PFAS-free alternatives? 66-plus 67-minus

    Although the evaluation of the restriction proposal is currently ongoing, Freudenberg Sealing Technologies has started to review alternative materials as part of its risk mitigation efforts. We have many high-performance materials in our portfolio that do not contain fluoropolymers. Due to our long-term experience and expertise in material development and testing, we are continuously evaluating application-based alternatives. We align on the specific options with each customer individually.

  • How does the European restriction proposal affect the global economy? What about the US? 66-plus 67-minus

    PFAS regulation is not only an EU-specific issue but will also have an impact on the global economy. Other jurisdictions around the world have also begun regulating, or are considering regulating, PFAS in products. In the US, individual states have begun restricting and requiring reporting on the use of intentionally added PFAS in all products (i.e., Maine and Minnesota) or for specific product groups. At the federal level, the US Environmental Protection Agency has finalized a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requiring reporting and recordkeeping for companies that manufactured or imported PFAS between 2011 and 2022, which includes companies that imported articles that contained PFAS in any amount during that period (the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule, 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 705). The regulation of PFAS-containing products is currently a very active area in which legislators and government agencies are developing laws and regulations at various levels.

  • What has been regulated regarding PFAS and the US Toxic Substances Control Act? 66-plus 67-minus

    TSCA provides EPA with the authority to require reporting, recordkeeping and testing requirements, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and mixtures. Certain substances are generally excluded from TSCA, including, among others, food, drugs, cosmetics, and pesticides.

    In 2019, the US Congress amended TSCA to require EPA to adopt a PFAS reporting rule, which EPA finalized in October 2023. This TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule imposes a one-time reporting and recordkeeping requirement on companies that manufactured or imported PFAS at any time between 2011 and 2022, including companies that imported articles (e.g., finished goods or components) in that period that contained PFAS in any amount. The rule does not apply to other activities that may involve PFAS, such as domestic distribution, processing, and use. The reporting period for the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule will not open until late 2024, and reports for most companies are due by May 8, 2025. As such, FST is currently evaluating the applicability of EPA’s new rule to our products, as we do for all other potentially relevant chemical laws and regulations.

  • Is there a correlation between PFAS restriction proposal and California Proposition 65? 66-plus 67-minus

    Proposition 65 is a California law that requires companies to provide warnings to the public about exposure risks for certain chemicals in their products. Proposition 65 currently contains requirements for certain specific PFAS, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). In contrast, the EU PFAS restriction proposal focuses on restricting PFAS as a broad chemical class (rather than simply requiring warnings for specific PFAS).

  • What is required for Maine PFAS reporting regulation (Maine PFAS Bill L.D. 1503)? 66-plus 67-minus

    The US State of Maine’s PFAS law as currently enacted (38 Maine Revised Statutes Section 1614) requires companies that manufacture products containing intentionally added PFAS for sale in the state to report information on such products to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) by January 1, 2025. The law also prohibits the sale, offer for sale, and distribution for sale in the state of any product containing intentionally added PFAS starting January 1, 2030, unless Maine DEP has determined that PFAS use to be a currently unavoidable use (CUU). The reporting obligation requires companies to submit information including a description of the product, the purpose of the PFAS in the product, the amount of each PFAS in the product, company contact information, and any additional information Maine DEP may require by rulemaking.

    Maine DEP has indicated that it plans to initiate rulemakings later this year to implement the law. The agency also solicited proposals, due March 1, 2024, from industry on products that should be covered by CUU determinations. Moreover, the Maine legislature is considering potential amendments to the law, though no formal legislative amendment has been set forth yet. As with the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule, FST is monitoring the evolving developments in Maine and is currently evaluating the applicability of the Maine law to our products.

  • How does the PFAS legislation in Minnesota look like? 66-plus 67-minus

    The US State of Minnesota has enacted a PFAS in products law (Minnesota Statutes Section 116.943) that is similar in scope to Maine’s law, but with different compliance dates. Specifically, Minnesota’s law requires manufacturers to report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on intentionally added PFAS in products by January 1, 2026, with reporting requirements that are similar to what is specified in Maine’s law. In addition, the Minnesota law restricts the sale, offer for sale, and distribution for sale of all products containing intentionally added PFAS starting January 1, 2032, unless the MPCA has determined the PFAS use to be a CUU (the law also has earlier restrictions for specific consumer products, such as cookware and cosmetics, that are not applicable to FST).

    The MPCA has initiated the rulemaking process to implement the state’s PFAS in products law. Namely, the MPCA hosted a public comment period in late 2023 to inform future drafting of the agency’s PFAS reporting and PFAS reporting fees rules, and then hosted another public comment period ending on March 1, 2024 to inform future drafting of a CUU rule. The MPCA will later publish draft rules for public notice and comment, and then it plans to adopt final rules by 2026. As in Maine and for the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule, FST is currently evaluating the applicability of this Minnesota law to our products.